When Lexmark came out with the Return Program Inkjet Cartridge, quite a few people in the inkjet remanufacturing industry took note. The Return Program inkjet cartridges have a built in kill feature that prevents a user or company from refilling and reusing that cartridge. For Lexmark this is a great money move, because it forces people to buy their cartridges, which means more money from them. Currently, from what I can tell, there is around 12 or so inkjet models that are Return Program Cartridges.
No one has found a way to get around the electronic aspect of the cartridge. Now for Lexmark everything is going all good and that, but there was a small problem that arose. Apparently, Lexmark took the kill feature that they use in their Return Program Cartridges from another company. On Feburary 22nd, 2010, Advanced Cartridge Technologies (we will call them ACT to save on time) sued Lexmark for patent infrindgement (link). Apparently ACT has three patent’s that they claim Lexmark is using without permission.
So how does this affect the user, nothing yet. However, if Lexmark loses (remember court battles can take years), there are two possible outcomes. 1. This could drive Lexmark under. ACT is seeking Triple damages. If Lexmark closes, there goes the supply of cartridges. (I doubt this could or will happen, but there is that possiblity.)
2. Lexmark stops the Return Program for Inkjets. Lexmark has in place for all of their Return Program Inkjet Cartridges a replacement cartridge that technically be refilled called the “A” version. The problem is that these cartridges cost around $2 more and are hard to find in a retail store. The lawsuit could stop the sales of Return Program cartridges and force consumers to spend more on already expensive inkjet cartridges.
We are years away from this lawsuit affecting anyone, but it will interesting to see what happens.